'Adipurush' Row: Supreme Court Rejects Plea Seeking Revocation Of Film's CBFC Certification

Prabhas and Kriti Sanon starrer 'Adipurush' landed into controversy post its바카라 웹사이트release. It faced backlash on social media for its dialogues. As per a report in ANI, on Friday, the Supreme Court of India stayed the proceedings that were pending before different high courts against the makers of the film. The apex court had also issued notice on an appeal filed by the makers of 'Adipurush' against the Allahabad high court order asking them to appear before it on July 27.

The news agency also stated that the court also declined바카라 웹사이트a "Public Interest Litigation (PIL)바카라 웹사이트seeking to revoke the CBFC certificate of the film for public exhibition for allegedly hurting religious sentiments".바카라 웹사이트A bench of Justices SK Kaul and Sudhanshu DhuliaSudhanshu Dhulia dismissed the PIL.바카라 웹사이트

“Everyone is touchy about everything now...tolerance for movies, books are going down,” remarked Kaul.바카라 웹사이트

For the unversed, the PIL was filed by Advocate Mamta Rani, who sought revocation of the film certificate of the movie for allegedly distorting sacred texts and also claimed that the portrayal of Hindu deities in 'Adipurush' violated the statutory provisions outlined in Section바카라 웹사이트5B of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. Advocate Ratnesh Kumar Shukla, who represented the바카라 웹사이트petitioner, argued that the film depicted the deities in a detestable manner.바카라 웹사이트

The bench didn't entertain the petitioner's arguments. As per livelaw.in,바카라 웹사이트Justice SK Kaul said, "Why should we entertain this under 32? The cinematography act provides for the method to get certificate. Everybody now is touchy about every thing. Every time they will come before the Supreme Court for it. Is every thing to be scrutinised by us? The level of tolerance for films, books, paintings keeps on getting down. Now people are hurt maybe sometimes genuinely, maybe sometimes not. But we will not under Article 32 start entertaining them."