Reformer Jyotiba Phule라이브 바카라 play ‘Tritya Ratna’ in the late 1800s put the spotlight on social realities including the exploitation of lower castes by Brahmins, was a subaltern counter to Bhave라이브 바카라 predominant narrative which involved glorification of mythology.
바카라 웹사이트
Parsi theatre on the other hand focused바카라 웹사이트on grand spectacles to tap into popularity, as well as adaptation of plays by popular English playwrights including Shakespeare. One of the first plays staged in Bombay by the Parsi Natak Mandali was the classical tragedy ‘Rostum and Zohrab’ based on the 10th-century epic by Persian poet Abolqasem Ferdowsi.
바카라 웹사이트
“Parsis had well-organized theatre groups with payments, contracts. They remade Shakespeare라이브 바카라 plays, by Indianising or Hindustanising them. Their plays were interesting because of the level of spectacle involved… The level of stagecraft for example, how they would manipulate certain effects, choreograph flying objects, building grand spectacles on stage… And to be able to do that with that level of precision was quite spectacular,” according to Ramanathan.
바카라 웹사이트
While English theatre too had its own presence in the British-occupied city, especially among the colonials and city elite, Marathi theatre took a nationalistic bent with the emergence of freedom fighters like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Krushnaji Khadilkar, etc.
바카라 웹사이트
Bombay was already a beacon of industrialization and had attracted waves of migration from the Konkan and Marathwada and other regions from the Bombay presidency. Tilak라이브 바카라 plan to use popular theatre to attract this working-class population to the freedom struggle was not unknown to the British.바카라 웹사이트
바카라 웹사이트
In the midst of this game of hide and seek between those who ran the stage and those in charge of statecraft, Khadilkar라이브 바카라 play ‘Kichak Vadh’, staged by the Maharashtra Natak Mandali needs to be singled out.
바카라 웹사이트
The play was based on a segment in the Mahabharata, in which Draupadi urges Bheem to kill Kichak, a royal courtier, after he tries to molest her. The play had a dual tone. One which dealt with the epic and the other, was a camouflaged and telling reference to colonial politics with an embedded nationalist response.
바카라 웹사이트
“It was a pauranik (mythical) drama dealing with the state of Pandavas in exile, when they were serving incognito at the court of King Virat as lowly servants. The play compared their condition to that of Indians serving as slaves under the British. Kichak symbolised Lord Curzon, and Draupadi, the partition of Bengal… Her appeal to Dharma (Yudhishthir) and Bhim to take up arms for her safety and to crush the enemy alluded to (Gopal Krishna) Gokhale and Tilak and their respective parties,” says Aravind Ganachari in his paper ‘The contribution of Marathi theatre to the growth of nationalism 1897-1913.'
바카라 웹사이트
Marathi theatre라이브 바카라 tryst with modernity and experimentation came after independence in the 1960s and 70s, largely credited to emerging stalwarts like Vijay Tendulkar, Vijaya Mehta, Mahesh Elkunchwar, etc.바카라 웹사이트
바카라 웹사이트
Their focus moved from the past to more existentialist subjects.
바카라 웹사이트
While Marathi experimental theatre still catered to the elite middle class, there were others like ‘Malvan라이브 바카라 Amitabh Bachchan’ Macchindra Kambli who also emerged on the scene, on the shoulders and talent of the Konkani textile workers, whose viewership was key to the sustenance of mass Marathi theatre.
바카라 웹사이트
His play Vastraharan, a comic farce inspired by the disrobing of Draupadi episode the Mahabharata, ran into 5,000 repeat shows across Mumbai, Maharashtra and other parts of the country.