Feminists critical of the List of Sexual Harassers in Academia (LoSHA), compiled by Indian-American lawyer Raya Sarkar, were probably ill-served by academic Shiv Visvanathan, when he tried to rally to their cause recently. Oozing an astonishing lack of self-awareness, Visvanathan라이브 바카라 essay in this magazine바카라 웹사이트 (The Chilly Justice of the Gulag, April 16) cast forensic light on exactly what is at stake in the, at times, falsely polarised battle between those who emphasise institutional due process and those who sought to ‘name and shame’ problematic behaviour which slips through institutional radars. An impassioned lament for the loss of heterosexual male entitlement, each self-pitying sentence in Visvanathan라이브 바카라 essay ironically ends up bolstering Ms Sarkar라이브 바카라 case. The LoSHA lists male academics who have been identified by different women as sexual predators and suggests that patriarchal power and바카라 웹사이트 institutional status have given some men a sense of entitlement and access to young women라이브 바카라 minds and bodies. Whatever the merits of Ms Sarkar라이브 바카라 case, Visvanathan라이브 바카라 essay is, unfortunately, expert testimony to the general existence of a sense of entitlement. It is important not in itself but as a symptom of a greater patriarchal malaise.