Goodbye IIMs

In a few weeks from now, the campaigning will begin for the Lok Sabha elections. And Dr Murli Manohar Joshiwill be boasting to vast crowds across the country of how, by slashing the IIMs’ academic fees, he has madethe country라이브 바카라 best management education accessible to the less-well-off and the poor. It will be a straightlie.

The decision to dramatically reduce the fees is unnecessary, stupid and dangerous. Unnecessary, because,one, the admission process of the IIMs, one of the toughest and fairest such tests in the world, makes nodistinction between rich and poor. You could be the prime minister라이브 바카라 grandson, but you stand as much (orrather, as little) chance of getting in as a poor farmer라이브 바카라 son from Jhoomritelaiya. (I did not give thisexample for effect. I interview for IIM Calcutta every year, and a few years ago, I was privileged torecommend admission for an engineer whose father and elder brothers still tilled a small plot of land atJhoomritelaiya.)

I, like every other alumnus of the IITs or IIMs, have personally known dozens of boys and girls fromimpoverished or rural backgrounds who have got into these premier institutes through sheer merit andtransformed their own lives, and the lives of their families and communities. More than creating poster boysfor Silicon Valley and Wall Street, this empowerment of thousands of disadvantaged Indians to reach their truepotential is the signal achievement of the IITs and IIMs.

Two, no IIM alumnus I know has ever heard of someone getting an admission to an IIM and then not joiningbecause he or she couldn’t afford it. If you do not have the money to pay the fees — and the fees, let라이브 바카라admit it, are pretty steep (as they should be, more on that later) — you just walk into the nearest bank. AnIIM offer letter is 24-carat collateral as far as any bank is concerned.

Since the early Nineties, when the government started cutting its subsidies to the IIMs, hundreds ofstudents have availed of these loans and paid back the loan after they graduated. In fact, you need not takemy word for it. Check the government라이브 바카라 latest India Shining ad. "By choosing to study further, I widen myknowledge," it reads. "By taking a loan for my education, I share the burden with my parents. By takingcare of their savings, I help them live a richer life... I make my India shine. I am India Shining." The adalso mentions that anyone — for example, Murli Manohar Joshi — wishing to know more about educationalloans at lower interest rates can email information@indiashining.com.

The fee-slashing decision is stupid, because, by increasing the government subsidies to the IIMs to reducethe fees, it just ends up wasting some more taxpayers’ money.

In effect, each IIM student every year is now going to get an extra subsidy of Rs 1.2 lakh from your and mypockets. We are going to make the IIM product 80 per cent cheaper. But are you and I going to enjoy thebenefits of that product? No. Those are going to be enjoyed by blue-chip corporations across the world who aregoing to recruit these hotshot MBAs.

Are these would-be-gods, in their gratitude to you, me, Dr Joshi and the nation for making their educationinexpensive, going to join the social sector, or manage our transportation or healthcare systems? A few ofthem will, and they would have done so even if their fees had not been reduced. The vast majority will jointhe Citigroups and Goldman Sachs of the world, earn salaries that look like telephone numbers, and pay taxesin the country they are posted in. In these times, when finding safe investment options which guarantee youanything more than 7 per cent a year is nearly impossible, Dr Joshi has just created a scheme with astartlingly high return on investment. Most IIM students would be recouping their entire expenses — academicand non-academic — within the first two months of their working lives!

So, instead of spending money where it is needed, in improving our basic school system, the government isactually shelling out our hard-earned tax money to subsidise giant multinational corporations! I am seriouslyconsidering joining the Swadeshi Jagran Manch.

And finally, the decision is dangerous, because making the IIMs totally dependent on subsidies could be thefirst step towards the government taking charge of all aspects of these fine institutes. Ask any alumnus orfaculty of the IITs and IIMs, and all of them, invariably, will tell you that the most important reason forthese being centres of such excellence is that the Indian government has always let them be. Successivegovernments have given the IITs and IIMs freedom to chart their own course. Once Dr Joshi and his minionsestablish complete financial control of the IIMs, surely it라이브 바카라 only a matter of time before they startmeddling with appointments and syllabi.

And we know where that road is going to lead to. Dr Joshi has already announced his intent to change theadmission process, have a government body conduct the entrance examinations, do away with the interviews andgroup discussions. This will open up the admission system to political and bureaucratic manipulation, have aserious impact on the quality of the intake, and deny these institutes their fundamental right to choose whothey want to admit and teach. And this could just be the beginning.

There are so few institutions we have built post-Independence that are still left unsullied. IndiraGandhi라이브 바카라 cynical politics damaged our public sector and banking system so grievously that they stillhaven’t recovered. The IITs and IIMs are almost the last few systems we have that are world-class. While hisgovernment speaks of aggressive disinvestment, the human resource development minister is hell-bent onnationalising our finest educational structures. And regiment our finest minds. For, education is finallyabout minds, both teacher and student. And the minds are the final prize that Dr Joshi will be looking to graband tweak. He must be stopped.

The writer, an IIT-IIM alumnus, is Managing Editor of 바카라. He is also the author of TheIITians. This piece was first published by the Hindustan Times.