Bollywood actress has taken her case to the Delhi High Court, to seek바카라 웹사이트the dismissal of a criminal case and an additional chargesheet presented by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in an alleged money laundering case worth Rs. 200 crore involving conman . The ED named her바카라 웹사이트an accused in the case through a supplementary chargesheet바카라 웹사이트filed by the Central agency.
The actress has been accused of benefiting바카라 웹사이트from the Rs. 200 crore extorted by Chandrasekhar바카라 웹사이트from Aditi Singh, the wife of former Fortis Healthcare promoter Shivinder Singh.바카라 웹사이트In the petition, she has claimed that the accusations against her are false.바카라 웹사이트
It started with바카라 웹사이트ED's FIR바카라 웹사이트filed by the Delhi Police's economic offences wing (EOW) in August 2022 against Chandrasekhar, for allegedly cheating and extorting money바카라 웹사이트from Aditi Singh. Now, the 'Race 3' actress is trying to dismiss the complaint dated August 8, 2021, and then바카라 웹사이트on August 17, 2022, along with all any related proceedings. In her plea, she states that the evidence presented by the ED proves her innocence.
"The petitioner is an innocent victim of Sukesh Chandrasekhar's maliciously targeted attack. There is absolutely no indication of her involvement in aiding him to launder his purportedly ill-gotten wealth,” read the plea.바카라 웹사이트
The petition also claimed that one of the accused, Pinki Irani,바카라 웹사이트introduced Sukesh Chandrasekhar to the actress under the disguise of being a fan who knew바카라 웹사이트former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, and expressing interest in casting her in a movie. The petition also said that Irani coerced the actress into accepting gifts from the conman and manipulated her into being in a relationship with him by offering바카라 웹사이트her Rs. 12 crore. At that바카라 웹사이트time, Sukesh Chandrasekhar was in jail, however, Pinki Irani purpotedly had shown her바카라 웹사이트photos of him in private jets and "roaming as a free man".
The Central agency countered saying that she "might have known" he was in jail and irrespective of it, accepted gifts from him. “Throughout their interactions, the main accused consistently presented himself as a free individual. The Petitioner had no way of knowing that the main accused was actually incarcerated, as his conduct always resembled that of a person at liberty,” the plea further added.
