Making A Difference

Leading From The Back

The Pakistani military still decides the fate of elected rulers

Leading From The Back
info_icon

WHILE almost everyone is aware of it, hardly anybody talks on record about the military’s role in the change of governments in Pakistan. The dismissal this time was no exception.

Even the most radical of leaders thought it best to remain cautious. Benazir Bhutto’s first reaction was that the armed forces were neutral and that it was President Farooq Leghari, a few non-political adventurists and some retired army officials who had toppled her. Even Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League, whose government was removed through a political formula brokered by the army in 1993, certi-fies that the armed forces had nothing to do with Benazir’s removal. Sharif has learnt his lessons. His blunt public remarks in the past have cost him heavily and he is regarded as unreliable and undependable by the military establishment.

There is little doubt that the army knew exactly what Leghari was doing. On the night of the dissolution, an army contingent was moved into Islamabad to take control of important buildings, including the Prime Minister’s House. Benazir was told that she could not go out or see anybody without permission.

Nobody dared question the army as to why the dismissed prime minister was not being allowed to move around as a free citizen. Politicians were stopped from boarding flights and their phones disconnected. Yet nobody from any political party had the courage to ask why they were being denied the basic civil rights. That is how the writ and the authority of the armed forces reigns in Pakistan.

Any change of government requires an affirmative nod from the army. "Whatever President Leghari did was not only with the consent but also with all-out support of the army," says Arif Nizami, editor of The Nation, a leading Pakistani daily.

The eventual outcome aside, indications were there for the last few months that the military leadership was getting restive and thinking in terms of a change.

Benazir’s first run-in with Leghari was over the appointment of army chief General Jehangir Karamat, when his predecessor, General Abdul Waheed Kakar, retired. Though considered a thoroughly professional soldier in Pakistan, the assessment in the Indian Foreign Office was that he would not remain as neutral as his predecessor was if things got bad. The Indian assessment seems to have come true. However, New Delhi is still monitoring the impact the change of guard in Islamabad has on bilateral relations and the Afghan situation.

Those surrounding Benazir had always expressed the confidence that the army would remain neutral and she would complete her term as prime minister—a major achievement since the previous three assemblies never completed their terms. But Benazir was often accused of being over-confident and ignoring objective reality. As fate would have it, even Karamat’s supposed neutrality could not save her. Whatever be the final verdict against the ousted PPP government, history will put it down as another end of a civilian democratic set-up, coming about as a result of Leghari’s civil-military constitutional coup.

and Sunil Narula in New Delhi바카라 웹사이트

Tags
CLOSE