National

The Indian Constitution In The Battlefield Of Ideas

The Lok Sabha is set to begin a two-day debate on the Constitution to mark 75 years of its adoption.

바카라 cover on the Constitution
바카라 cover on the Constitution
info_icon

Today, December 13, 2024, the Lok Sabha will begin a two-day debate on the Constitution to mark 75 years of its adoption.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to speak on December 14, and the debate may see the first parliamentary speech of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. This debate will see the INDIA block looking to present a stark contrast between its view on the Constitution and the meaning of India and that of the BJP.

In this context, here is a note on the various issues that 바카라 has brought to its readers in which it discussed constitutional issues in depth:

On November 26, 1949, the Constituent Assembly of India adopted the Indian Constitution, paving the way for it to come into effect on January 26, 1950. Since then, the guiding light for the polity has withstood multiple challenges to its basic tenets.

In 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared the day as Constitution Day or Samvidhan Divas. “Our Constitution is more than a legal document. It라이브 바카라 an instrument of society,” he said, addressing Parliament on the occasion. BJP members sitting behind him broke into applause. 

바카라 cover on the secularism question
바카라 cover on the secularism question
info_icon

Ironically, the period during which the Modi government has been in power has seen more cases before Constitution Benches of the Indian Supreme Court than any other before it. One of the first challenges from the government was  introducing the NJAC and pushing for the removal of the Supreme Court collegium, which the apex court bench struck down as unconstitutional. The government has also won many of the cases; legal experts often cite the Supreme Court라이브 바카라 silence on the legality of the 2019 abrogation of Article 370 in Kashmir as an example. 바카라 had examined in detail what a Kashmir Without 370 would look like in its August 19, 2019 issue. Prem Shankar Jha had written about the Hindutva-RSS agenda behind the abrogation and Yashwant Sinha had called out the move as further widening the divide in India. 

바카라 cover on Kashmir without Article 370
바카라 cover on Kashmir without Article 370
info_icon

This decade under the Modi government has been marked by challenges to writ of the Indian Constitution. Starting with his 2014 promise of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) to the government라이브 바카라 bid to remove the Supreme Court collegium, to the most recent General Election slogan of “Ab Ki Baar 400 Par”, the number of Lok Sabha seats the ruling party would need to amend the Constitution. 

The BJP라이브 바카라 promise to amend the Constitution if elected with a two-third majority ended up galvanising the Opposition parties who formed the INDIA bloc coalition with the sole aim of preventing a saffron sweep in the 2024 General Elections. As 바카라라이브 바카라 Editor Chinki Sinha said in the June 21, 2024 issue, the little red book won in the end. The INDIA bloc did not get the majority, but their ‘win’ was in protecting the Constitutional document from any potential change as Mukul Kesavan wrote for 바카라. The BJP라이브 바카라 loss in States like Ayodhya where it had delivered its Ram Janbhoomi promise also showed how the nation had become seemingly tired of communal politics, wrote Tanul Thakur. 

바카라 cover on Uniform Civil Code
바카라 cover on Uniform Civil Code
info_icon

The UCC, conceptualised by Ambedkar, has found an odd proponent in the BJP. But, more often than not UCC is brandished by BJP supporters as a way to check “privileged minorities.” In 바카라라이브 바카라 June 11, 2023 issue Uniform Civil Code, Omar Rashid questioned whether a country as diverse as India could ever be a progressive model of governance. Abhik Bhatacharya underscored Rashid라이브 바카라 asks by explaining how Adivasi culture had been ignored while drafting the UCC. The Code has also been questioned by women for its patriarchal roots, Nivedita Menon wrote for 바카라.

Even today, as India walks into the 75th year of the Constitution and takes it further, as Law Minister Kiren Rijju said this morning, the SC has had to strike down a challenge to the Constitution which has asked it to remove the words secular from the Preamble. 

CLOSE